A Lull in the Language:

Language as a Zone of Problematization in Selected Partition Narratives

  • Dr. Barnali Saha Assistant Professor
Keywords: Partition, short stories, language, culture, violence

Abstract

The Partition of India in 1947 was a defining moment in the socio-cultural and political history of the Indian subcontinent. Although elided as an acarpous incident to the appeal of a decolonized India forwarded by the saga of India’s independence at midnight, the Partition of India and the birth of Pakistan are two incidents indelibly important to our cultural topography. As such feminist scholars, writers, creative and critical thinkers composed a series of narratives dramatizing, illustrating, problematizing the Partition problem from a literary, cultural and humanistic point of view.  The present research paper reads two such creative works that problematize the ideology of division, the violence of rioting and particularly, the sectarian nature of human viciousness. However, the paper performs this task by reading the language of the two short stories and underscoring how etymological and philological qualities of a language can be used to creatively represent and illustrate a violent incident.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Dr. Barnali Saha, Assistant Professor

Dr. Barnali Saha is an Assistant Professor at Vivekananda School of English Studies, Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies, New Delhi, India. As a research scholar, Dr. Saha has published several papers and has attended and presented at several national and international conferences. Her areas of academic interest include Postcolonial Studies, Partition Literature, Translation, Popular Culture and Gender Studies.

References

1. Booth, Wayne. The Rhetoric of Fiction, Second edition, University of Chicago Press, 1983.
2. Chander, Krishan. “The Peshawar Express,” in Stories about the Partition of India, vol. 3, ed. Alok Bhalla. Manohar Books, 2012.
3. Daiya, Kavita. 2008. Violent Belongings: Partition, Gender, and National Culture in Postcolonial India. Philadelphia: Temple University Press
4. Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse Revisited. Cornell UP. ([1983] 1988).
5. Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse. An Essay in Method. Cornell UP, ([1972] 1980)
6. Ghosh, Nabendu. “The Saviour” (“Traankarta”) translated from Bangla by Sarmistha Dutta Gupta. Bengal Partition Stories: An Untold Chapter, edited by Bashabi Fraser. Anthem Press, 2008.
7. Hardison, O.b., Jr., “A Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics,” Aristotle’s Poetics.
8. Englewood Cliffs, 1968.
9. Prakash, Bodh. Writing Partition: Aesthetics and Ideology in Hindi and Urdu Literature. Pearson Longman, 2009.
10. Toolan, Michael. Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction. Routledge, ([1988] 2001).
11. Tufte, Virginia. Artful Sentences: Syntax as Style. Graphics Press LLC, 2006.
Published
2023-02-10
How to Cite
Saha, D. B. “A Lull in the Language:”. Contemporary Literary Review India, Vol. 10, no. 1, Feb. 2023, pp. 21-68, https://mail.literaryjournal.in/index.php/clri/article/view/897.
Section
Research Papers